Skip to content
March 8, 2013 / Corina Valderrama

Court Rules that Employees’ Time Spent on Company Bus Travelling To and From Work Facility Not Compensable

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, which covers Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas, has confirmed that a mandatory  employed by S&B Engineering and Construction Services (S&B) does not require compensation to employees for time spent traveling.

employee_busAccording to the Fair Labor and Standards Act (FLSA), “[t]ime spent traveling during normal work hours is considered compensable work time.”  However, whether or not time spent in travel is compensable time depends upon the kind of travel involved.  For example, traveling to and from home and work before and after the regular workday is not considered work time.  Activities performed during travel time typically must be burdensome on the employee and particularly important for the employer to be compensable.

In this case, S&B required all employees working at its petrochemical plant in Port Arthur, Texas to park in a designated lot 7 miles away and take a company bus to and from the facility.  The bus ride took approximately 20-30 minutes each way.  The parking lot and buses were considered an extension of the job site and were subject to S&B’s rules of conduct, which prohibited fighting, littering, smoking and possessing weapons, among other things.

The lawsuit was filed as a class action alleging the company’s mandatory busing policy violated the FLSA by failing to compensate workers for their travel time.  The suit argued that (1) the company derived an economic benefit from the busing system; (2) workers were considered to be “on the worksite” and subject to S&B’s work rules during the commute; and (3) the bus rides were “integral and indispensable” to working at the plant.

However, the Court of Appeals confirmed that S&B’s mandatory bus-travel requirement involved “normal traveling time that the laborers would also be required to undertake by the mere fact of working at the [petrochemical plant]” and was not compensable under the FLSA.

Specifically, the court noted that workers did not perform any work before the start of their shifts and did not receive work-related instructions before or during the bus rides.  The FLSA considers a “workday” to begin and end when an employee commences and ceases his/her “principal activity.”

If you feel that you or someone you know has not been properly compensated for travel time, please contact Khorrami, LLP for a private consultation.

 

About these ads

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Consumer Advocate Legal Update

Insight and Commentary on Consumer Legal Issues

Plaintiffs-Advocate

Insight and Commentary on Individual Rights

Fair Employment Legal Update

Insight and Commentary on Legal Employment Issues

Khorrami, LLP News

Legal Updates and News About California's Premier Plaintiffs' Law Firm

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 377 other followers

%d bloggers like this: